Petitioner challenged the Additional Commissioner's appellate order setting aside a Grampanchayat member's disqualification for Government land encroachment under Section 14(1)(j-3). The High Court held the appellate order perverse as it ignored the Tahsildar's report and quashed it, restoring the Collector's disqualification.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:13398
27 WP-1332-2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 1332 OF 2023
[Pravin Vasanta Mankar .Vrs. Eknath Vithoba Deotale and Ors.]
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders.
Mr B. M. Kharkate, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr A. R. Wagh, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr A. A. Madiwale, AGP for Respondent/State. Mr A. S. Kolhe, Advocate for Respondent No.4.
CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE, J. DATE : 9 th DECEMBER 2024.
TAMBE
27 WP-1332-2023
2
TAMBE
27 WP-1332-2023
3
JUDGE
TAMBE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Additional Commissioner could set aside the Collector's disqualification order under Section 14(1)(j-3) for encroachment on Government land without discarding the Tahsildar's report.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Pravin Vasanta Mankar
Eknath Vithoba Deotale
State of Maharashtra
Anil L. Pansare
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
