Petitioner in a writ petition sought leave to amend the petition citing subsequent developments. The court granted leave, allowed amendment to be carried out within two weeks with a copy served on the other side, and listed the petition for further consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
0208caw216.24
1
2024:BHC-NAG:8306-DB
Order
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CIVIL APPLICATION [CAW] NO. 216/2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7489/2023.
Sayeed Khan Yusuf Khan
The State of Maharashtra and others.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Shri P.B. Patil, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri N.R. Rode, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : VINAY JOSHI AND M.W. CHANDWANI, JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 02, 2024.
Heard.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Rgd.
Sayeed Khan Yusuf Khan
The State of Maharashtra
Vinay Joshi
M.W. Chandwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
