Disposed

M/S Shakti Stone Industries, through Its Proprietor, Kisanbhai Narayan Patel v. the Union of India, Thr. Its Secretary, Ministry of Environment Forest and Climate Change, New Delh

Bombay HC1 Mar 2024CAW/2063/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed an amendment application in a writ petition challenging an ECZ notification despite the petitioner's absence. The court appointed an Amicus Curiae, directed respondents-state to submit compliance reports, and listed the matter for further consideration.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; Amicus Curiae appointed; Respondents directed to submit compliance response; Petitioner directed to remove objections.

M/S Shakti Stone Industries, through Its… — Environment and Pollution | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-NAG:2512-DB

¶2

902-WP-6334-2018.odt 1

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.6334 of 2018

¶5

M/s.Shakti Stone Industires

¶6

vs.

¶7

Union of India and others.

¶8

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order

¶9

None for petitioner/applicant.

¶10

Shri N. S. Deshpande, Dy. Solicitor General of India, for respondent no.1. Shri Amit Madiwale, Assistant Government Pleader for respondents-State.

¶11

CORAM :- NITIN W. SAMBRE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE :- 1^st MARCH, 2024.

¶12

CIVIL APPLICATION (W) NO. 2063 OF 2019

¶13

Issue in this petition pertains to challenge to the final notification issued by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change of the Central Government, in exercise of powers under subsection (3) of Section 3 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and Rule 5 of the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986. By issuing final notification, the Central Government notifies the Eco-sensitive Zone. The said final notification is sought to be questioned in the petition through this amendment application.

¶14

Since the petitioner has not removed office objections, this Court has passed conditional order on 02.02.2024 for removal of office objections. However, the office objections have not been removed so far.

¶15

Today, neither the counsel for petitioner is present nor he has removed the office objections.

¶16

However, considering the nature of challenge, we deem it appropriate to allow the said amendment application. The amendment be carried out accordingly. The application stands disposed of.

¶17

902-WP-6334-2018.odt 2

¶18

Writ Petition No.6334 of 2018

¶19

Since the counsel for the petitioner is absent, we deem it appropriate to appoint Shri K. P. Mahalle as Amicus Curiae in the matter as the issue pertains to the protection of the environment. We direct the Registry to provide copy of the entire pleadings along with annexures to Mr. K. P. Mahalle, learned counsel, within a period of one week from today.

¶20

2 As far as challenge in the petition is concerned, the petitioner claims that at present it is operating quarry of mine and minerals which rights are hampered because of issuance of the notification referred above in exercise of powers under sub-section (3) of Section 3 of the Environment (Protection) Act.

¶21

The fact remains that the final notification is sought to be brought to the notice of this Court as referred above. Perusal of the final notification shows that it correspondingly casts duty on the respondents-State Government of not only to prepare zonal master plan of Eco-sensitive Zone but also for the measures to be taken in relation to land use, natural water bodies, tourism, natural heritage, man-made heritage sites, noise pollution, air pollution, discharge of effluents, solid wastes, bio-medical waste, vehicular traffic, vehicular pollution, plastic waste management, construction and demolition waste management, E-waste, industrial units and protection of hill slopes.

¶22

The notification further provides for the activities prohibited or to be regulated or promoted within the Eco-sensitive Zone.

¶23

In the wake of the aforesaid final notification, we deem it appropriate to call upon the respondents-State to submit their response as to the compliance carried out till this date about the discharge of responsibilities as are reflected in the final notification.

¶24

902-WP-6334-2018.odt 3

¶25

The learned Assistant Government Pleader who has already waived service for the respondent nos. 2 to 5 to submit their response within a period of four weeks from today.

¶26

List the petition for further consideration on 01.04.2024.

¶27

In the meantime, the petitioner to remove office objections.

¶28

(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)

¶29

Andurkar.

M/S Shakti Stone Industries, through Its Proprietor, Kisanbhai Narayan Patel v. the Union of India, Thr. Its Secretary, Ministry of Environment Forest and Climate Change, New Delh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Shakti Stone Industries, through Its Proprietor, Kisanbhai Narayan Patel v. the Union of India, Thr. Its Secretary, Ministry of Environment Forest and Climate Change, New Delh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjeevkumar Bisanji Ilme and Another Vs Maharashtra Tribal Public School Society, Mumbai through Chairman and Chief Secretary and Another

Pandurang Ramrao Ghuse Vs Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Thr. Its Chief Executive Officer, Mumbai and Ors.

Ramakrishna Electricals Limited, Nagpur Thr. Managing Director, S. Ramalingam Vs Maha. State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. Mumbai and Others

Pradip Ujagarsingh Thakur Vs the State of Maha., Thr. Secretary for Urban Development Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Shri. Bhuyar Charitable and Religious Trust, Khanapur, Thr. President, Amravati and Another Vs Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Amravati and Another

Dr. Pratibha Uttamrao Ingole Vs State of Maharashtra, National Commission for Scheduled Caste, Thr. Member, New Delhi and Others