Writ petition disposed of as infructuous at the request of the petitioner's counsel. No costs. No substantive determination on any issue was made by the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:2536-DB 946-WP-6054-22.od t
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO.6054 OF 20 22
Pradip Ujagarsingh Thakur, Tukaram Ward, Wardha
-vs-
State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Urban Development Dept. Mantralaya, Mumbai and ors.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and the Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's Orders.
Shri A. B. Patil, Advocate for petitioner.
Ms N. P. Mehta, Additional Government Pleader for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Shri M. I. Dhatrak, Advocate for respondent No.3.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : March 01, 2024
(Abhay J. Mantri, J.) (Nitin W. Sambre, J.)
Asmita
Pradip Ujagarsingh Thakur
State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Urban Development Dept.
Nitin W. Sambre
Abhay J. Mantri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
