Petitioner challenged the Divisional Commissioner's order disqualifying her as a Gram Panchayat member for encroaching government land. The High Court found the findings based on material on record were not perverse and declined interference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:6035
19-wp-2154-24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH: NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2154 OF 2024
Ms Ayushi Dangre for the Petitioner. Ms Prachi Joshi for the Respondent/State. Mr. M.V. Rai for Respondent No.5.
CORAM : N. R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 13 JUNE 2024.
PC:-
1/2
Dinesh S. Sherla
19-wp-2154-24.doc
(N.R. BORKAR, J.)
2/2
Dinesh S. Sherla
Signed by: DINESH SHERLA Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 13/06/2024 17:54:17
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Divisional Commissioner's order disqualifying the petitioner as a Gram Panchayat member for encroachment on government land under Section 14(1)(j-3) called for interference.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sau. Kanchan w/o. Arvind Kadav
Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur Division, Nagpur
Additional District Collector, Bhandara
Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Tadgaon
Talathi – Dhop, Gram Panchayat, Tadgaon
Shri. Shravan s/o. Sitaram Doye
N. R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
