Civil application seeking permission to amend a writ petition to incorporate subsequent developments was allowed, with the amendment to be carried out within three weeks and liberty given to the contesting respondent to file a reply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 8-caw-118-24.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
C IVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO. 118/2024
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 4073/2010
Mahendra s/o Sheetalprasad Jain Vs. Altaf Ahmed s/o Abdul Majeed WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 2524/2010
Zanaklal s/o Surajlal Lilhale Vs. Gram Panchayata Ratnara & another
Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court's or Judge's orders of Coram, Appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
WP No. 4073/2010 Ms. M.D. Bhambhwani, Advocate for petitioner / applicant Mr. A.S. Manohar, Advocate for Respondent WP No. 2524/2010
Mr. V.U. Waghmare, Advocate for Petitioner Mr. K.P. Mahalle, Advocate for Respondent No.10
CORAM: N.R. BORKAR, J.
DATED : 10th JUNE, 2024
Civil Application (CAW) No. 118/2024
By this application permission is sought to amend the petition to incorporate subsequent developments.
2 8-caw-118-24.odt
JUDGE
MP Deshpande
Mahendra s/o Sheetalprasad Jain
Altaf Ahmed s/o Abdul Majeed
Zanaklal s/o Surajlal Lilhale
Gram Panchayata Ratnara & another
N.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
