Civil application to bring the legal heirs of a deceased appellant on record with condonation of a 127-day delay in seeking to set aside abatement. Respondents did not seriously oppose. Delay condoned and application allowed, amendment to be carried out within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AS:9873
18cas995-17
sa_mandawgad
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.995 OF 2017 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.857 OF 2012
Rama Janu Koli and Ors. … Applicants. Versus
Sou. Sushila Gajanan Patil and Ors. … Respondents.
Mr. C.G. Gavnekar, for the Applicants. Mr. R.S. Datar, for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4.
CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 28, 2024
P. C.:
record the legal heirs of the deceased-Appellant No.3 and for condonation of delay of 127 days caused in filing an Application for setting aside the abatement. Learned counsel appearing for the Respondents does not seriously oppose the Application.
condoned. Application is allowed. Amendment to be carried out
within a period of two weeks from today.
(Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.)
1/1
Signed by: Sanjay A. Mandawgad Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 01/03/2024 12:13:30
2 issues framed by the court
Should the 127-day delay in filing an application to set aside abatement be condoned?
Should the legal heirs of the deceased Appellant No.3 be brought on record?
Rama Janu Koli and Ors.
Sou. Sushila Gajanan Patil and Ors.
Sharmila U. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
