Single-judge writ petition challenging interim maintenance granted by Trial Court. Petitioner argued omissions regarding dependents; Bench held order not devoid of merits and dismissed.
Writ petition dismissed; interim maintenance order not interfered with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
12-WP-2686-2024.doc
Harish
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2686 OF 2024
Dattatray Manohar Kharat ...Petitioner Versus Priyanka Dattatray Kharat ...Respondent --------------------
Adv. P. J. Shejul for the Petitioner.
CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 27, 2024
P. C. :
by the Trial Court granting interim maintenance of Rs. 7,000/- to the Respondent and the minor child.
1/2
12-WP-2686-2024.doc
material to show that any provision for the maintenance of the wife and minor child has been made by the Petitioner. The Trial Court has also considered that the monthly salary of the Petitioner is about Rs. 30,120/and also the 7/12 extract which shows agricultural land in his name. As such the Trial Court considered that apart from the monthly salary, there is also an agricultural income.
(SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J. )
2/2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the Trial Court's discretion on granting interim maintenance.
Whether the submission of new dependents (handicapped sister) warrants revision of the maintenance order.
Dattatray Manohar Kharat
Priyanka Dattatray Kharat
Sharmila U. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
