Civil application in a second appeal; the court adjourned the matter for two weeks to enable the petitioner to file an application for the correct and detailed address of respondent no. 2.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION IN SA NO. 44 OF 2024 In
SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO. 35 OF 2024
Sau Sushila Wd/o Pundlikrao Dharmey ....PETITIONER V/S
Sau Seema W/o Ganesh Itankar And Other ....RESPONDENT
R. R. PRAJAPATI for Petitioner
N. S. GIRIPUNJE (FOR R 1) for Respondent
CORAM : REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) J DATE : 19th December, 2024
P.C. :
Present. S.O. to two weeks to file application for correct and detailed address of R.No. 2.
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL )
Page 1/1
Sau Sushila Wd/o Pundlikrao Dharmey
Sau Seema W/o Ganesh Itankar
Registrar (Judicial)
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
