Shri Vasant S/O Madhav Jiwtode v. Sou Rupali W/O Pravin Jiwtode and Another

Bombay HC4 Dec 2024CAS/1015/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Second appeal challenging decrees in a civil appeal concerning a partition deed dated 28/01/2008. Notices were issued to respondents on the proposed substantial questions of law, and the execution and operation of the judgment and decree, including an issued possession warrant, were stayed until respondents appear.

What did the court decide?

Execution and operation of the judgment and decree, including possession warrant, stayed till appearance of respondent; matter adjourned to 07/01/2025.

Shri Vasant S/O Madhav Jiwtode vs Sou Rupali W/O Pravin Jiwtode and… — Partition | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

56CAS1015.2024.odt

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAS) NO. 1015 OF 2024 IN SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO. 18612 OF 2024

¶5

Vasant s/o Madhav Jiwtode Vs Sou Rupali w/o Pravin Jiwtode and another.

¶6

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order

¶7

Mr. O.R. Deshpande, counsel appellant.

¶8

CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J. DATED : 04/12/2024.

¶9

By preferring this appeal, the appellant original plaintiff has challenged the judgment and decree passed in Regular Civil Appeal No. 43/2019, the following substantial questions of law involved in the appeal;

¶10

a] Whether the District Judge erroneously considered that the partition deed dated 28/01/2008 is illegal and not binding on the plaintiff and by contradicting its own finding, and negated that the plaintiff is entitled for declaration as prayed by him?

¶11

b] Whether the judgment of the trial Court as well as the First Appellate Court is erroneous as contradicted its own finding on the relevant points, especially on a partition-deed dated 28/01/2008?

¶12

Issue notices to the respondents on the above substantial questions of law.

rkn

56CAS1015.2024.odt

Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that after passing of the judgment, the respondents already preferred an execution petition, and a possession warrant is already issued. If the present appellant loses the possession, there would be a multiplicity of the proceedings. In view of that, the execution, i.e. possession warrant issued by the executing court, is stayed.

¶17

Perused the judgment passed by the First Appellate Court as well as the trial court and submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant, the execution and operation of the judgment and decree be stayed till the appearance of the respondent.

¶18

Stand over on 07/01/2025.

¶19

[ URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.]

¶20

Signed by: Mr. R.K. NANDURKAR rkn Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 09/12/2024 18:23:58

Shri Vasant S/O Madhav Jiwtode v. Sou Rupali W/O Pravin Jiwtode and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri Vasant S/O Madhav Jiwtode v. Sou Rupali W/O Pravin Jiwtode and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Nitin S/O Vijay Shere (Dead) Thr. Guardian W/O Vijay Shere vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. the Secretaru, Revenue Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai

Mr. Mahadeo S/O Khamdeo Rokade and Others vs Mrs. Mangala W/O Bhojraj Lanjewar and Other

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. Thr the Branch Manager Nagpur vs Smt. Savita Wd/O Ashokrao Kale and Others

Bindeshwari Pradad Gupta vs Rupesh S/O Balwant Wairagade

Shankar Vishwanath Bangadkar (Dead) Thr. Lrs. Pramod Shankar Bangadkar and Another vs Pundalik Vishwanath Bangadkar and Others

Ramaji Doliya Korku (Deceased) through Its Legal Heirs Smt Jijabai Ramaji Dhikar and Others vs Manang Jake Dhikar (Deceased) through His Legal Heirs Bhuralal Sukhlal Dhikar and Others