Sanjay Gadodia v. Man Ss Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
Commercial arbitration petition adjourned due to paucity of time on the balance daily board; interim relief, if any, earlier granted continued until the next date.
What did the court decide?
Ad-interim/interim relief, if any, earlier granted continued till next date.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-0
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 391 OF 2024
Sanjay Gadodia ....PETITIONER V/S Man Ss Limited ....RESPONDENT
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FIRDOSH PHIROZE POONIWALLA J
DATE : 4th December, 2024
P.C. :
Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 05/02/2025 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date.
( ASSOCIATE )
Page 1/1
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sanjay Gadodia
- respondent
Man Ss Limited
Coram
Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Aditya Birla Finance Limited vs Amrutansu Mallick
Shri. Nagnath Uddhav Kadam vs the State of Maharashtra through Prin. Secretary, Dept. of Textile and Co-Op. and Ors.
Nisargaland Scape Pvt. Ltd. Thr. Its Signatory Authority Pankaj P. Patil vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Principal Secretary Urban and Development Department and Anr.
Rattan Lalchand Mukhi and Anr. vs Arth Housing Development Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.