Ajay Gupta v. Devanshu Bansal
Case brief
What is this about?
Commercial arbitration petition adjourned; respondents sought time to file affidavits in reply, with rejoinder permitted and hearing listed for October 2024.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
32-CARBP-363-2024.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION
COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 363 OF 2024
Ajay Gupta …Petitioner Versus Devanshu Bansal …Respondent
- Mr BM Chatterjee, Senior Advocate , with Udayan Mukherjee, Abhinav Mathur & Lokesh Pawaskar, i/b Chir Amrit Legal LLP, for the Petitioner.
- Mr Sharan Jagtiani, Senior Advocate , with Mutahhar Khan, i/b Bellator Legal Advocates LLP, for Respondent No. 1.
Mr Rohan Cama , with Sneha Vani, i/b Sneha Vani Marjadi, for Respondent No. 2.
SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE
Digitally signed by SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE Date: 2024.09.24 10:44:22 +0530
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ajay Gupta
- respondent
Devanshu Bansal
- respondent
Respondent No. 2
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
17 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court