Mahindra and Mahindra Limited v. G3 Motors Limited and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim adjournment in a commercial arbitration application. No reply had been filed despite time granted; respondents given a last chance to file affidavit in reply, rejoinder permitted thereafter, service on unserved respondents allowed, and matter listed for further hearing.
What the court decided
18-CARAP-211-2024 (O).doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 211 OF 2024
Mahindra And Mahindra Limited
...Applicant
Versus
G3 Motors Limited & Ors.
...Respondents
Ms. Niyati Shah i/b MLS Vani & Associates for the Applicant. Mr. Gauraj Shah a/w Mr. Rishir Daulat, Mr. Raj Adhia & Ms. Shruti Shirke i/b TRD Associates for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4.
CORAM : ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.
DATE : 18 DECEMBER 2024
P.C.:
- The learned counsel for the applicant, at the very outset, invites my attention to an order dated 20 June 2024, by which respondent nos. 2 to 4 sought time to file reply. Accordingly, time was granted until 4 July 2024 to file reply to the said application. However, despite several time having been gone, no reply has been placed on record till date.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mahindra And Mahindra Limited
- respondent
G3 Motors Limited
Coram
Advait M. Sethna
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court