Section 11 commercial arbitration application concerning a road works contract where the dispute-resolution steering committee was constituted only after the application was filed. The court noted the respondent may not rely on that committee as a defence and stood the matter over for instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by MULEY MULEYSHUBHAMPRAVINRAO SHUBHAMPRAVINRAODate:2024.10.05 16:27:22 +0530
1 46-CARAP-126-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 126 OF 2024
Dilip Buildcon Limited
...Applicant
Vs.
Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Limited ...Respondent
Mr. Amir Arsiwala a/w Monika Tanna, Dhara Modi and Nandita Dethe i/by Singhania Legal Services for the Applicant.
Mr. J. D’Souza i/by Bulwark Solicitor for the Respondent.
CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 3RD OCTOBER, 2024
P.C.:-
1/2
Shubham
2 46-CARAP-126-2024.doc
open for the Respondents to take the defence that there is a steering committee
now in place.
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)
2/2
Shubham
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Visa International Ltd. Vs. Continental Resources (USA) Ltd.Referred¶1
(2009) 2 SCC 55 · Who else cites this
Datar Switchgears Ltd. Vs. Tata Finance Ltd.Referred¶1
(2000) 8 SCC 151 · Who else cites this
Dilip Buildcon Limited
Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Limited
Arif S. Doctor
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
