Disposed

Union of India, New Delhi through Its Secretary, Central Railways, Mantralaya, New Delhi and Others v. Shri. Tukaram Dhondbaji Ladekar and Other

Bombay HC18 Sept 2024CAF/1100/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Civil application for condonation of 730 days' delay in filing a first appeal over an award, plus permission to deposit the award amount of Rs.19,22,320/-. Delay condoned, two weeks given for deposit, appeal set down after four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Delay condoned; two weeks' time granted to deposit Rs.19,22,320/- per the award; notice to issue on the first appeal.

Union of India, New Delhi through Its Secretary, Central… — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-NAG:10482

¶2

1 15-CAF-1100-24.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO. 1100 OF 2024

¶5

¶6

FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 25407 OF 2023

¶7

UNION OF INDIA, NEW DELHI AND OTHERS Vrs.

¶8

SHRI TUKARAM DHONDBAJI LADEKAR AND ANOTHER

¶9

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order

¶10

Coram, appearances, Court's Orders

¶11

or directions and Registrar's order

¶12

Shri Vandan Gadkari, Advocate for appellants.

¶13

Ms. D. I. Charlewar, AGP for respondent No.2-State.

¶14

CORAM: SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 18/09/2024.

¶15

This is an application for condonation of delay of 730 days.

¶16

Perused the application.

¶17

Heard learned Advocates for both sides.

¶18

Delay of 730 days is caused for obtaining the legal opinion and completing the formalities, etc. The delay is not deliberately caused.

¶19

Considering peculiar set of facts, it would be

¶20

proper to allow this application in the interest of justice.

¶21

The application is allowed. Delay of 370 days

¶22

caused for preferring the appeal is condoned.

¶23

The application is disposed of.

¶24

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO. 2363 OF 2024

¶25

This is an application for permission to

¶26

deposit amount as per the award.

¶27

2 15-CAF-1100-24.odt

¶28

Perused the application.

¶29

Heard learned Advocates for both sides.

¶30

Learned advocate for the appellant submits that cheque amount of Rs.19,22,320/- is ready. He seeks time to deposit the amount.

¶31

Two weeks time is granted to deposit the cheque.

¶32

After the deposit of amount, learned advocate for the appellant is directed to communicate this order of depositing the amount to the learned Reference Court i.e. Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wardha.

¶33

FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 25407 OF 2023

¶34

Issue notice to the respondents. 15. Ms. D. I. Charlewar, learned AGP waives service of notice for respondent No.2.

¶35

Stand over after four weeks.

¶36

[SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.]

¶37

Choulwar

¶38

Signed by: V.M. Choulwar (VMC) Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 19/09/2024 19:10:01

Union of India, New Delhi through Its Secretary, Central Railways, Mantralaya, New Delhi and Others v. Shri. Tukaram Dhondbaji Ladekar and Other

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Union of India, New Delhi through Its Secretary, Central Railways, Mantralaya, New Delhi and Others v. Shri. Tukaram Dhondbaji Ladekar and Other

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Devkabai Daulatrao Dhoke Vs the State of Maharashtra through Collector, Yavatmal and Others

The Exe. Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Pusad, Yavatmal Vs Bhima Dhaku Rathod (Dead) Smt. Yashodabai Bhima Rathod and Others

Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Pusad Vs Arvind Panjabrao Naik and Others

Rajendra S/O Narayan Pardhakhe vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Collector, Yavatmal and Others

Pralhad Rodbaji Shinde vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

M. I. D. C. through Chief Executive Officer, Amravati vs Ramesh Shrinarayan Jaipuria and Others