Single judge order in Bombay HC where the court condoned a 23-day delay in filing a Second Appeal by the applicant, despite opposition, and disposed of the Civil Application.
Condonation of delay and registration of Second Appeal allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1}
908-ca7468.18.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7468 OF 2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7469 OF 2018 IN SECOND APPEAL ST. NO. 13316 OF 2018
Saraswatibai Tanaji Gavane and others
Applicants
Versus
Tanaji Baburao Gavane & others Respondents
Mr. Avinash N. Raut, advocate for the Applicants Mr. S. N. Boiwar, advocate for Respondents No.1a to 1d Mr. S. M. Gunjkar, advocate holding for Mr. S. R. Deshpande, advocate for Respondent No.11
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.
DATE : 18th January, 2024
PC :
Heard rival submissions.
The applicants-appellants are seeking condonation
of delay of only 23 days in filing this Second Appeal. The learned Counsel for Respondents No.1a to 1d and Respondent No.11, though opposed the application, but considering the short period of delay, it stands condoned.
The Second Appeal be registered after removal of
908-ca7468.18.odt
{2}
office objections, if any.
The Civil Application is accordingly disposed of.
(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE
adb
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an order condoning delay of 23 days in filing a second appeal should be allowed.
Saraswatibai Tanaji Gavane
Tanaji Baburao Gavane
Sandipkumar C. More
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
