In Second Appeal No. 08 of 2014, the High Court at Aurangabad disposed of the appeal as withdrawn on the appellant's counsel's submission of an out-of-court settlement and produced communication to that effect.
appeal and connected civil application dismissed as withdrawn
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
918sa08.14.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
SECOND APPEAL NO. 08 OF 2014 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10525 OF 2007
Sudhakar Jaiwantrao Deshmukh
Appellant
Versus
Rawan Bhau Jadhav & another
Respondents
None present for the Appellant
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.
DATE : 18th January, 2024
PC :
The record shows that nobody remained present for the appellant on 05th October 2023. Today also, none present for the appellant. The matter appears to be of 2007. As such, stand over to 01.02.2024 by way of last chance with direction that if nobody appears on behalf of the appellant, it will be dismissed for default.
(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE e
{2} 918sa08.14.odt
Later on at 02:30 p.m.:
Learned Counsel Mr. Golewar for the appellant appeared and produced on record communication dated 09.11.2023 issued to him by the appellant mentioning that the parties have settled the matter out of Court. The said communication is taken on record and marked “X” for identification.
In view of the same, the Second Appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn along with pending C. A. No.10525/2007.
(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE
adb
Sudhakar Jaiwantrao Deshmukh
Rawan Bhau Jadhav
another
Sandipkumar C. More
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
