Dismissed

Popat Janardhan Kulkarni v. Ajinath Shashikant Kulkarni Minor through Mangala and Others

Bombay HC6 May 2024CA/4443/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Presenting against a resignation from the Appeal Court under the effect of Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act. The court dismissed the appeal with a liberty to file an application under Section 263, keeping the limitation period open. It disposed of a pending civil application.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw the appeal with liberty to file an application under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act granted.

Popat Janardhan Kulkarni Vs Ajinath Shashikant… — Succession and Inheritance | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-AUG:9659

¶2

8-SA-489-2019.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

SECOND APPEAL NO. 489 OF 2019 WITH

¶5

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4443 OF 2024

¶6

POPAT JANARDHAN KULKARNI

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

AJINATH SHASHIKANT KULKARNI AND OTHERS

¶9

Mr. S. S. Kulkarni, Advocate for appellant Mr. A. B. Kadethankar, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2-a to 2-e Mr. V. S. Badakh, Advocate for respondent Nos. 4 to 7

¶10

CORAM : Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.

¶11

DATE : 06 MAY 2024

¶12

PER COURT :-

¶13

After advancing the argument for quite some time, the

¶14

learned Counsel for the appellant/original plaintiff seeks leave to withdraw the present appeal with liberty to file application under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act., before the same Court which has granted probate certificate.

¶15

2. Needless to say that the appellant/plaintiff filed R.C.S.

¶16

No.202 of 2003 and prayed for decree of declaration that the will

¶17

1 of 3

¶18

(( 2 )) 8-SA-489-2019

¶19

deed dated 01.07.1995 allegedly executed by deceased Janardhan Kulkarni, the father of the appellant/plaintiff in favour of his nephew defendant No.1 Ajinath Shashikant Kulkarni as well as order dated 16.10.1997 passed by the learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Ahmednagar in Probate Application No. 10 of 1997 in favour of defendant No.1 is null and void.

¶20

It is submitted that, since the Civil Judge Senior Division, Ahmednagar passed an order in probate proceeding and granted probate in favour of the defendant, therefore, only remedy is available to the plaintiff under Chapter 3 of the Indian Succession Act. However, the plaintiff filed separate suit seeking declaration that the order passed in probate proceeding is null and void. On 16.10.1997, the learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Ahmednagar passed the judgment and dismissed the suit of the plaintiff. Further, the first appellate Court upheld the judgment and order of the trial Court vide it’s judgment and order dated 19.12.2017 passed in R.C.A. No.362 of 2011.

¶21

Section 299 provides appeal from order of District Judge. Since under Section 263 of Indian Succession Act, the appellant

¶22

2 of 3

¶23

(( 3 )) 8-SA-489-2019

¶24

having remedy for seeking revocation of succession certificate, therefore, I do not find that both the Courts have committed any illegalities.

¶25

Since the plaintiff sought withdrawal of the appeal with permission to file application under Section 263, therefore, leave granted as prayed for. However, the point of limitation is kept open and it can be decided on its own merit.

¶26

Accordingly, Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

¶27

Pending civil application is disposed of.

¶28

[ Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ]

¶29

SMS

¶30

3 of 3

Popat Janardhan Kulkarni v. Ajinath Shashikant Kulkarni Minor through Mangala and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Popat Janardhan Kulkarni v. Ajinath Shashikant Kulkarni Minor through Mangala and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Babulal Sitalram Sahu, L.R. Sumitrabai, Deleted and Another Vs Laxminarayan Sitalram Sahu, L.Rs. Annapurna and Others

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Indirabai Laxman Yerkal and Ors.

Jagannath Kautik Saidane (through Gpa) Kapil Vinayak Saindane Vs the State of Maharashtra Special Land Acquisition OFFICER-2, Upper Tapi Project, Hatnur

Popat Janardhan Kulkarni Vs Ajinath Shashikant Kulkarni and Others

Sachin Babu Nagpure Vs Waseem Akram Shaikh Hamid and Ors.

Saraswatibai Sidhlingappa Vyavhare and Others Vs Annapurna Manohar Khadke and Others