The High Court at Bombay Bench Aurangabad disposed of Second Appeal No. 580 of 2013 upon the submission of a mediation report indicating an amicable settlement between the parties through a settlement deed.
The appeal stands disposed of in view of the terms of the settlement deed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:9512
912-580-13
..1..
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
912 SECOND APPEAL NO. 580 OF 2013
BABULAL SITALRAM SAHU, L.R. SUMITRABAI, DELETED AND ANOTHER VERSUS
LAXMINARAYAN SITALRAM SAHU, L.RS. ANNAPURNA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Appellants : Mr. S. N. Patne
h/f. Mr. Anil S. Bajaj
Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : Mr. Ajay T. Kanawade and Mr. V.S.Ghongade
CORAM : Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. DATE : 03.05.2024
PER COURT :
the present appeal were referred to the mediator. Accordingly Mr. Milind M. Patil – Beedkar, the mediator conducted mediation between
the parties and submitted report dated 04.04.2024 which has been received by this Court. It is taken on record and marked as ‘Exhibit X’ for identification.
..2.. 912-580-13
(Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.)
shp
BABULAL SITALRAM SAHU
LAXMINARAYAN SITALRAM SAHU
Y. G. KHOBRAGADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
