Ms Sai Man Power Services Jalgaon through Its Proprietor Yashwant Lodhu Bhoi v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjournment order dated 04.09.2024; Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench; coram Mangesh S. Patil and Shailesh P. Brahme, JJ.; 'due to paucity of time'; batch adjournment of numerous writ petitions (W.P. Nos. 2770/1992 up to 6912/2024, including clusters with civil applications such as CA/797/2024, CA/1282/2024, CA/1992/2024, CA/2108/2024) and Family Court Appeals (FCA 89/2022, 40/2023, 52/2023, 85/2022) to dates 25.09.2024 to 06.12.2024; multiple matters 'in urgent category'; interim relief/undertaking/statement to continue till next date; no merits determined; no parties, advocates, statutes or precedents named.
What did the court decide?
Purely administrative adjournment: the batch of matters listed at serial nos. 963 to 1022 (writ petitions and family court appeals) adjourned to the dates mentioned against them (ranging from 25.09.2024 to 06.12.2024, several marked 'in urgent category'), with any interim relief, undertaking or statement ordered to continue till the next date. No merits adjudicated.