Applicants sought condonation of a 65-day delay in filing a First Appeal against the State and others. The court allowed the civil application, condoned the delay, directed registration of the appeal, admitted the First Appeal, and listed it for hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:3972-DB
1
12928.12CA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
942 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12928 OF 2012 IN FAST/20668/2012
BALAJI MURALIDHAR GABALE AND ORS VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
Advocate for Applicants : Adv.H.B.Nandagavale h/f. Adv.V.G.Sakolkar
AGP for Respondent-State : Adv.V.M.Chate
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 22.02.2024
P.C. :
1] The present Civil Application is filed to condone delay of 65 days in filing the First Appeal.
2] For the reasons stated in the civil application, the same is allowed. Delay is condoned. Appeal be registered. Civil Application is disposed of accordingly.
3] First Appeal is admitted . On admission, learned AGP waives notice of respondent no.1.
4] List this First Appeal on 12th April, 2024.
[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE
DDC
1 issue framed by the court
Should the 65-day delay in filing the First Appeal be condoned?
Balaji Muralidhar Gabale and Ors
The State of Mah
Ors
Arun R. Pedneker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
