The High Court at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad allowed connected writ petitions and civil applications. The bench permitted service on the respondent via paper publication in 'Daily Punyanagari' as personal service was unfeasible.
Permission granted to serve respondent No.1 through paper publication in 'Daily Punyanagari'.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
926 WRIT PETITION NO. 1847 OF 2023
RAMNIWAS RAMNATH KHATOD AND OTHERS VERSUS
MARUTI SAMPAT BHANUSE AND ANOTHER
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. P. S. Mantri h/f Jethliya Dhiraj R. Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. N. S. Muthiyan
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1908 OF 2023
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1893 OF 2023
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1905 OF 2023
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1850 OF 2023
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1888 OF 2023
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12197 OF 2023 IN WP/1847/2023
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12199 OF 2023 IN WP/1850/2023
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12200 OF 2023 IN WP/1888/2023
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12198 OF 2023 IN WP/1908/2023
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. Dated : January 19, 2024
PER COURT :-
2
926 WP 1847-2023
12198/2023 are filed for service on respondent No.1 by paper publication.
( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. )
vj gawade/-.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether civil applications and connected writ petitions for service by newspaper publication be allowed when respondent cannot be served personally.
RAMNIWAS RAMNATH KHATOD AND OTHERS
MARUTI SAMPAT BHANUSE
ANOTHER
ARUN R. PEDNEKER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
