Disposed
Madhav Ramrao Panchal v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Bombay HCCA/12123/2024
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:29223-DB
1 910ca12123o24
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12123 OF 2024
IN WP/5187/2019
MADHAV RAMRAO PANCHAL VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Shri O.B. Boinwad, Advocate i/by Shri Giri Umakant P., Advocate for the Applicant.
Ms. V.N. Patil Jadhav, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2/State.
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL &
PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, JJ.
DATE : 11th December, 2024
Per Court :-
Respondent No.3 has been duly served, but has not
appeared.
Application, which has gone uncontested and taking into account
the nature of dispute, the Civil Application is allowed and the
Writ Petition is restored subject to payment of costs of Rs.5,000/-
(Rupees Five Thousand), with a further condition that all office
objections shall now be removed within four weeks.
kps ( PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) ( MANGESH S. PATIL, J. )
MADHAV RAMRAO PANCHAL
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
MANGESH S. PATIL
PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court