Procedural order on two civil applications in a pending writ petition. Office objections to one application were removed and it was allowed; on the other, seeking impleadment of Respondent No. 8, notice was issued to the proposed respondent, returnable on 05 April 2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:5090-DB
916-CA-1061-2024+.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1061 OF 2024
IN WP/12243/2023
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1254 OF 2024
IN WP/12243/2023
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 12243 OF 2023
Nikhil Satish Chavan
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra Through
Its Secretary And Ors
...
Mr. Y. V. Kakde, Advocate for Applicant
Mr. S. B. Narwade, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 6
...
CORAM:RAVINDRA V. GHUGE &
R. M. JOSHI, JJ
DATE:MARCH 08, 2024
PER COURT :
ORDER BELOW CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1061/2024
All office objections have been removed. The Civil
Application is allowed.
ORDER BELOW CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1254/2024
1. The Petitioner desires to add Respondent No. 8.
2.Issue notice to the proposed Respondent No. 8,
returnable on 05th April, 2024.
(R. M. JOSHI, J) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J)
Malani
Page 1 of 1
Nikhil Satish Chavan
The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary
Ravindra V. Ghuge
R. M. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court