Writ petition withdrawn by petitioner instructed advocates on 7th March 2024. Disposal order by Bench at Aurangabad lacks substantive merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:5224-DB
( 1 ) 911 wp 2012.23
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
911 WRIT PETITION NO. 2012 OF 2024
DILIP MAHADU SHINDE VERSUS
GENERAL MANAGER RETAIL SALE MSO INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD AND ANOTHER
… Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Darak Badribishan A. Advocate for Respondents : Mr. A.P. Bhandari
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & R.M. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 7th March, 2024
P.C. :-
has instructed him to withdraw this petition.
withdrawn on instructions.
[R.M. JOSHI, J.]
[RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.]
mub
DILIP MAHADU SHINDE
GENERAL MANAGER RETAIL SALE MSO INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
R.M. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
