Allowed

Manojkumar Madhavlal Rawal v. State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC1 Mar 2024BA/756/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail under Section 439 CrPC in a cheating case arising from a partnership dispute; applicant in jail over a year with charge-sheet filed and documentary evidence with the IO. Bail granted on a PR bond of Rs.25,000, with monthly police-station attendance and trial attendance conditions.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on PR bond of Rs.25,000 with one surety, subject to monthly police-station attendance and trial-attendance conditions.

Manojkumar Madhavlal Rawal vs State of Maharashtra — Cheating and Forgery | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

(34)-BA-756-2024.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.756 OF 2024

¶5

Manojkumar Madhavlal Rawal ... Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent

¶6

Mr. Karansingh Rajput I.by Mr. Amarnath Boddul, for the applicant. Ms. Veera Shinde, APP, for the Respondent/State.

¶7

Mr. Sharad Surve, PI, Mandavi Police Station, present.

¶8

VARSHA DEEPAK GAIKWAD

¶9

Digitally signed by VARSHA DEEPAK GAIKWAD Date: 2024.08.22 17:29:58 +0530

¶10

CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR, J.

¶11

DATE : 21ST AUGUST, 2024.

¶12

PC:

¶13

Heard.

¶14

By this application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure the applicant is seeking bail in Crime No.122 of 2023, registered with Mandavi Police Station, Palghar, for the offences punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

Having gone through the charge-sheet and the relevant material collected by the IO during the investigation, it is evident that dispute is related to the partnership between the applicant and the company.

¶16

The applicant is in jail from last more than 1 year and in the meantime, the charge-sheet has been filed.

1 of 3

varsha

(34)-BA-756-2024.doc

Thus, considering the nature of allegations and the nature of evidence collected by the IO, since all the relevant documentary evidence is in possession of the IO, I am of the opinion that further custody of the applicant is not necessary.

¶21

In the circumstances, though the learned APP is strongly opposing the application, I pass the following order:

¶22

ORDER

¶23

(i) Criminal Bail Application is allowed and disposed off;

¶24

(ii) It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail in Crime No.122 of 2023, registered with Mandavi Police Station, Palghar, for the offences punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code., on furnishing P.R.Bond of Rupees Twenty Five Thousand with one solvent surety in the like amount;

¶25

iii) The applicant shall provide his address and name of the nearby police station to the IO, which he shall attend the said Police Station on 1st day of every month between 10.00a.m 11.00a.m, till the conclusion of the trial except on the date of trial;

¶26

iv) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case, as also not tamper with the

2 of 3

varsha

(34)-BA-756-2024.doc

evidence;

v) Liberty is granted to the State for cancellation of bail if the applicant commits similar offence;

¶32

vi) The applicant shall attend the trial before the Trial Court regularly on every date unless exempted by the trial Court for any reason.

¶33

(ANIL S. KILOR, J)

¶34

3 of 3

¶35

varsha

Manojkumar Madhavlal Rawal v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manojkumar Madhavlal Rawal v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt. Jamunadevi Wd/O Girdhardas Chandak and Others Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Ministry of Revenue and Forests, Mumbai and Others

Naresh Rangrao Yerane Vs Honble Additional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati and Others

Nagar Yuvak Shikshan Sanstha, Nagpur Thr. Secretary, Mr. Ravi D. Meghe Vs Rajkumar Manohar Dhole and Others

Akash Santosh Devrukhe vs State of Maharashtra

Santosh Vinodkumar Tiwari vs State of Maharashtra

Anehe Kingsley Chinedu vs the State of Maharashtra