Ali Ayyakannu Shaikh@Murty v. State of Maharashtra
What the court decided
914_BA_737, 1151, 1192_24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 737 OF 2024
Ali Ayyakannu Shaikh @ Murty … Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
WITH BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1151 OF 2024
| Mohammad Ali Sayyed @ Sameer | … | Applicant |
|---|---|---|
| vs. | ||
| The State of Maharashtra | … | Respondent |
WITH
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1192 OF 2024
Zahid Ali Sayyed @ Salman … Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Ms. Misbaah Solkar a/w. Ms. Faiza Gawandi for applicant in BA/737/2024. Mr. R. M. H. Jabali, i/b. Mr. Pathan Shumayza Shukat Ali for applicants in BA/1151/2024 and BA/1192/2024.
Mr. Balraj B. Kulkarni, APP for respondent-State in BA/737/2024.
Mr. Kiran C. Shinde, APP for respondent-State in BA/1151/2024 and BA/1192/2024.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicants in BA Nos.1151 and 1192 of 2024 could claim parity with a co-accused granted bail despite specific overt acts attributed to them
Whether the applicant in BA No.737 of 2024 was entitled to bail on parity with a similarly placed co-accused given his limited role and doubtful MCOC invocation
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Ali Ayyakannu Shaikh @ Murty
- applicant
Mohammad Ali Sayyed @ Sameer
- applicant
Zahid Ali Sayyed @ Salman
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court