Shekhar Ramlu Kotap v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application adjourned due to paucity of time; interim orders, if any, to continue until the next date of hearing.
What did the court decide?
Interim order, if any, to continue till 14/12/2024.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-0
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 725 OF 2024
Shekhar Ramlu Kotap ....APPLICANT V/S
The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE J
DATE : 18th November, 2024
P.C. :
Due to paucity of time, stand over to 14/12/2024. Interim order, if any, to continue till then.
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Page 1/1
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Shekhar Ramlu Kotap
- respondent
The State Of Maharashtra
Coram
Manish Pitale
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
17 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Standard Trading Company vs the Shipping Master Govt. Shipping Office
The Kandivali Roop Nagar Co-Op Hsg Society Ltd. vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
The Bank of India Staff Panchsheel Co. Operative Housing Soc Ltd. vs Jitendra Kumar Jani and Ors.
S. M. Computers Pvt. Ltd. vs the Inspector General of Registration and Controller of Stamps, M.S. Pune and Anr.