Deepak Shankar Kale v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application listed but the applicant was absent and no counsel appeared; the State noted that a copy of the application was not served on it. The court adjourned the matter to a later date without deciding it.
What the court decided
930 BA 716.24.doc
Dusane
BHALCHANDRA GOPAL IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY DUSANE CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally signed by BHALCHANDRA GOPAL DUSANEDate: 2024.02.21 BAIL APPLICATION NO.716 OF 2024 17:29:38 +0530
Deepak Shankar Kale …Applicant V/s. State of Maharashtra & Anr. …Respondents
None for Applicant
Ms. Savita M. Yadav, APP for Respondent-State.
CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATE: 21st February 2024
- P.C.:
1. None present for the Applicant.
2. Ms. Yadav, learned APP states that copy of the Bail Application is not served on the Respondent-State.
3. Stand over to 6th March 2024 .
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Deepak Shankar Kale
- respondent
State of Maharashtra
Coram
Madhav J. Jamdar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
17 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court