Disposed

Yuraj Baban Sutar v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC22 Feb 2024BA/702/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application in a murder case arising from a sudden quarrel between two intoxicated men at a bar and restaurant. The court found prima facie substance in the contention that the incident occurred spur-of-the-moment, noted the charge-sheet and lengthy trial ahead, no criminal antecedents, and granted bail with conditions including reporting to police.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail on PR bond of Rs.25,000/- with one or two solvent sureties, subject to conditions including twice-monthly police reporting and passport surrender.

Yuraj Baban Sutar Vs the State of Maharashtra — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

914 BA 702.24.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

BHALCHANDRA GOPAL DUSANE

¶4

Digitally signed by BHALCHANDRA GOPAL DUSANE Date: 2024.02.22 19:22:35 +0530

¶5

CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 702 OF 2024

¶6

Yuvraj Baban Sutar ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent

¶7

Mr. Brijesh Upadhyay a/w Mr. Akshay Salvi i/by Mr. Avinash Rasal for the Applicant. Mr. Sameer M. Mangaonkar, APP for Respondent-State.

¶8

CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 22nd February 2024

¶9

P. C.

¶10

1. Heard Mr. Upadhyay, learned Counsel appearing for the

¶11

Applicant and Mr. Mangaonkar, learned APP appearing for the Respondent-State.

¶12

2. This regular Bail Application is preferred under Section 439

¶13

of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The relevant details are

¶14

as follows:-

¶15

1. C.R. No.	289 of 2023
2. Date of registration of F.I.R.	3^rdJuly 2023
3. Name of Police Station	Bhigwan, District-Pune
4. Section/s invoked	302, 307, 327, 504 ofIndian Penal Code, 1860
5. Date of incident	1^stJuly 2023
6. Date of arrest	4^thJuly 2023
7. Date of fling Charge-sheet	26^thSeptember 2023

¶16

3. Mr. Upadhyay, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant

¶17

1/4

¶18

Dusane

¶19

914 BA 702.24.doc

¶20

submitted that even if the entire prosecution case is accepted as it is, the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 is not made out. He submitted that the incident in question has taken place suddenly and in a spur of the moment. He also pointed out various lacunae in the investigation. He submitted that investigation is completed, and Charge-sheet is fled therefore the Applicant be released on bail.

¶21

4. On the other hand, learned APP has strongly opposed the Bail Application. He submitted that there are eye-witnesses to the incident, apart from that there is a C.C.T.V. footage showing the involvement of the Applicant in the crime.

¶22

5. Perusal of the record shows that the incident in question has taken place in a bar and restaurant where both the Applicant and the deceased were inebriated.

¶23

6. It appears that at around 8.00 p.m. both of them started consuming liquor and after around 45 minutes a quarrel broke out between them and then the Applicant suddenly assaulted the deceased.

¶24

7. Prima facie there is substance in the contention raised by Mr. Upadhyay, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant that the incident in question has taken place in a spur of the moment.

¶25

8. In this case, the incident has taken place on 1^st July 2023,

¶26

2/4

¶27

Dusane

¶28

914 BA 702.24.doc

¶29

F.I.R. was lodged on 3^rd July 2023, the Applicant was arrested on 4^th July 2023, and Charge-sheet has been fled on 26^th September 2023. As per the Charge-sheet, there are about 27 witnesses proposed to be examined by the prosecution. The trial is likely to take a considerably long time.

¶30

9. The Applicant does not appear to be at risk of fight.

¶31

10. The Applicant does not have any criminal antecedents.

¶32

11. Accordingly, the Applicant can be enlarged on bail by imposing conditions.

¶33

12. In view thereof, the following order:-

¶34

O R D E R

¶35

(a) The Applicant -Yuvraj Baban Sutar be released on bail in connection with C. R. No.289 of 2023 registered with the Bhigwan Police Station, District-Pune on his furnishing P. R. Bond of Rs.25,000/- with one or two solvent sureties in the like amount.

¶36

(b) On being released on bail, the Applicant shall furnish his cell phone number and residential address to the Investigating Offcer and shall keep the same updated, in case of any change thereto.

¶37

(c) The Applicant shall report to the Bhigwan Police Station, District-Pune twice in a month i.e. on the frst and

¶38

3/4

¶39

Dusane

¶40

914 BA 702.24.doc

¶41

third Sundays of every month between 11.00 a.m. and 1.00

¶42

p.m. until the conclusion of the trial.

¶43

(d) The Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case, so as to dissuade such a person from disclosing the facts to the Court or to any Police personnel.

¶44

(e) The Applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence and shall not contact or infuence the Complainant or any witness in any manner.

¶45

(f) The Applicant shall attend the trial regularly. The Applicant shall co-operate with the Trial Court and shall not seek unnecessary adjournments thereat.

¶46

(g) The Applicant shall surrender his passport, if any, to the Investigating Offcer.

¶47

13. The Bail Application is disposed of accordingly.

¶48

14. It is clarifed that the observations made herein are prima

¶49

facie and the trial Court shall decide the case on its own merits uninfuenced by the observations made in this Order.

¶50

[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]

¶51

4/4

¶52

Dusane

Yuraj Baban Sutar v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yuraj Baban Sutar v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijendra @ Bhai Vijay Gawand Vs State of Maharashtra

Godawari W/O Rameshwar Karale and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra

Rajnikant Revansiddha Balshankar and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sandeep Shashikant Patil Vs State of Maharashtra

Rohan Arun Bansode Vs State of Maharashtra

Sanjay Baban Bhapkar Vs State of Maharashtra