Shridhar Charuddata Phadtare v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application listed; no substantive judicial decision taken. Stand over to 26/08/2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-53
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 552 OF 2024
Shridhar Charuddata Phadtare ....APPLICANT V/S
The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT
WITH CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 991 OF 2024 In
Criminal Bail Appln. 552 OF 2024
Madhav Mukund Phadtare ....PETITIONER V/S
The State Of Maharashtra And Ors ....RESPONDENT
Adv. Mosin Naik a/w Adv. SATISH MULEY for Applicant. Ms. Rutuja Amberkar, APP for State- Respondent
( Mentioned out of turn at. 5.30 p.m )
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE J DATE : 30th July, 2024
P.C. :
S. O. to 26/08/2024 ( H. O. B.).
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Page 1/1
Shridhar Charuddata Phadtare
The State Of Maharashtra
Madhav Mukund Phadtare
Manish Pitale
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court