Disposed

Vishal @ Sampat Kondiba Thombare v. State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC4 Jan 2024BA/480/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicant in custody since September 2018 sought regular bail after earlier applications were rejected or withdrawn. The APP undertook to conclude the trial within two months with three witnesses remaining. Bail application was disposed of without release; trial court directed to conclude trial by 31 March 2024, with liberty to reapply if not done.

What the court decided

AI extract

Vishal @ Sampat Kondiba Thombare Vs State of Maharashtra — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

925 BA 480.23.doc

¶2

Dusane

¶3

BHALCHANDRA GOPAL DUSANE

¶4

Digitally signed by BHALCHANDRA GOPAL DUSANE Date: 2024.01.04 18:09:47 +0530

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶6

BAIL APPLICATION NO.480 OF 2023

¶7

Vishal @ Sampat Kondiba Thombare …Applicant

¶8

V/s.

¶9

State of Maharashtra & Anr. …Respondents

¶10

Mr. Rupesh Zade a/w Priyanka Gupta for Applicant Ms. Veera Shinde, APP for Respondent- State. PSI, D.B. Lendve, Baramati Taluka Police Station present.

¶11

CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATE: 4th January 2024

¶12

P.C.:

¶13

1. The Applicant is seeking regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

¶14

2. The incident is of 1^st September 2018 and the F.I.R. has been lodged on 2^nd September 2018. The applicant has been arrested on 2^nd September 2018 in C.R.No. 455 of 2018.

¶15

3. The first Application seeking bail was rejected by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati on 13^th March 2019. The second Bail Application has been rejected by the learned

¶16

1/3

¶17

925 BA 480.23.doc

¶18

Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati on 8^th July 2020.

¶19

4. The Applicant filed Criminal Bail Application No.2713 of 2021 in this Court. By order dated 17^th January 2022, a learned Single Judge (Coram : C.V. Bhadang J.) recorded that after arguing the matter for some time, a learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant withdrew the Application with a request to expedite the trial. Accordingly, the learned Single Judge directed the learned Trial Court to conduct the trial as expeditiously as possible and make an endeavour to conclude the same within one year. Thereafter the present Bail Application has been filed on 9^th February 2023, immediately after one year period is over.

¶20

5. A learned Single Judge (Coram : M.S. Karnik, J) by Order dated 5^th September 2023 passed in this Bail Application adjourned the Application and requested the learned Trial Court to expedite the trial.

¶21

6. Mrs. Veera Shinde, learned APP states that one witness has been examined and only three more witnesses will be examined. She states that the trial will be concluded within a period of two months.

¶22

7. Accordingly, the learned Trial Court is requested to conduct the trial expeditiously and conclude the same by 31^st March 2024.

¶23

2/3

¶24

925 BA 480.23.doc

¶25

8. The Application is disposed of. However, if the trial is not concluded by 31^st March 2024, liberty is given to the Applicant to file fresh Bail Application.

¶26

(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.)

¶27

3/3

Vishal @ Sampat Kondiba Thombare v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Vishal @ Sampat Kondiba Thombare v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pooja Sunil Wagh Vs the State of Maharashtra

Jessi Angelo Dsouza Vs State of Maharashtra through Manikpur Police Station

Kalawati Manoj Gaikwad Alias Kalawati Rama Zakde Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Yogesh Manohar Mestry Vs State of Maharashtra

Kiran Baburao Patil Vs State of Maharashtra

Suraj Motiram Shejwal Vs State of Maharashtra