Bail application under the Code of Criminal Procedure; counsel sought withdrawal with liberty to reapply after one year if trial made no substantial progress. The court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the application on those terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7 BA 1134.23.23.doc
Dusane
BHALCHANDRA GOPAL DUSANE
Digitally signed by BHALCHANDRA GOPAL DUSANE Date: 2024.01.03 17:59:20 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.1134 OF 2023
Jessi Angelo D’Souza …Applicant
V/s.
State of Maharashtra …Respondent
Mr. Vikas K. Salgia and Mr. Ravishankar Dwivedi for Applicant.
Ms. Mahalakshami Ganpathy, APP for Respondent No.1- State.
Ms. Sagayamary M. for Respondent No.2.
CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATE: 3rd January 2024
P.C.:
1. Mr. Ravishankar Dwivedi, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant after arguing the matter for some time, seeks withdrawal of the Bail Application with liberty to file the application after a period of one year, in case, there is no substantial progress in the trial.
2. Accordingly, the Bail Application is allowed to be withdrawn
and dismissed as such with liberty as aforesaid.
(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.)
1/1
Jessi Angelo D'Souza
State of Maharashtra
Madhav J. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
