Rushikesh Machindra Kashid v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail applications stand over due to paucity of time. Interim orders, if made, to continue until further order.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-969
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 4749 OF 2024
Rushikesh Machindra Kashid ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT
WITH
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 4751 OF 2024
Kunal Babaji Takalkar ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR J DATE : 13th December, 2024
P.C. :
Due to paucity of time, stand over to 16/12/2024. Interim order, if any, to continue till then.
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Page 1/1
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Rushikesh Machindra Kashid
- applicant
Kunal Babaji Takalkar
- respondent
The State Of Maharashtra
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
The Chief Officer, Municipal Council, Mul, Chandrapur Vs Vinod S/O Arunrao Yenurkar and Others
Naresh S/O Chandumal Jotwani Vs Naresh S/O Sadashivrao Karwatkar and Anothe
Wine Corner, Amravati Thr. Proprietor, Shri. Vijay Kumar Gulabchand Bhamore and Anr. Vs State of Maha., Thr. the Principal Secy., Dept. of State Excise, Mumbai and Ors.
Shri. Rajesh Shyambhadur Singh and Another Vs Shri. Kiran Shantaya Chenaveni and Others