The High Court directed a Special Judge to complete the trial in Special Case No. 135 of 2022 within nine months. The appellant was granted liberty to revive his bail application if the trial exceeded this period.
Directed trial to conclude within nine months; applicant granted liberty to revive bail prayer if trial delayed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
9-ba-466-2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.466 OF 2023
VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR
Digitally signed by VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR Date: 2024.01.18 10:59:32 +0530
Pintu Dhananjay Rajbhar ...Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr. Amarendra Jha i/b. M/s. Legal Hopes, for the Applicant. Mr. S.R. Agarkar, APP, for the Respondent/State. Mr. S.R. Salunkhe, PSI, Kurar police station.
CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATE : JANUARY 17, 2024
P.C.:
APP for the State.
Vishal Parekar
...1
9-ba-466-2023.doc
applicant is at liberty to revive his prayer for bail.
Application disposed.
(N. J. JAMADAR, J.)
Vishal Parekar
...2
Pintu Dhananjay Rajbhar
The State of Maharashtra
N. J. Jamadar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
