Applicant sought protection; the court had granted ad-interim protection with liberty to seek cancellation of a non-bailable warrant before the Sessions Court, which cancelled the warrant. The application having served its purpose was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
922-APL1574-2023.DOC
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1574 OF 2023
SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI
Digitally signed by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2024.01.18 13:28:27 +0530
Harsh Krishanchander Kalra ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and anr. …Respondents
Mr. S. R. Aagarkar, APP for the State/Respondent.
CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED: 16th JANUARY, 2024
PC:-
ad-interim protection this Court had given liberty to the
applicant to appear before the Appellate Court and seek cancellation of non-bailable warrant.
submits that the applicant had appeared before the Court of
Session and the warrant has been cancelled by an order dated 9th January, 2024.
1/1
Harsh Krishanchander Kalra
The State of Maharashtra
N. J. Jamadar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
