Mohd. Wahiddudin Mohd. v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application adjourned on the ground that the applicant's advocate on record is unwell.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
bipin prithiani
1
924-ba-4494.24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 4494 OF 2024
Mohd. Wahiddudin Mohd. … Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Adv. Khatri for the Applicant. Mr. Bapu V. Holambe-Patil, APP for Respondent-State.
CORAM: MANISH PITALE, J. DATE : 14th DECEMBER 2024
P.C. :
- . A request for adjournment is made on the ground that the
- Advocate on record is not well.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mohd. Wahiddudin Mohd.
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
Manish Pitale
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court