Rahil Sattar Chauhan v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application adjourned for a day due to paucity of time; any interim order to continue until the next date.
What did the court decide?
Interim order, if any, continued till 12/12/2024.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-0
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 4267 OF 2024
Rahil Sattar Chauhan ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR J DATE : 11th December, 2024
P.C. :
Due to paucity of time, stand over to 12/12/2024. Interim order, if any, to continue till then.
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Page 1/1
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Rahil Sattar Chauhan
- respondent
State Of Maharashtra
Coram
Anil S. Kilor
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
17 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Pawankumar Bharti S/O Kisanlal Bharti Vs Abrar Ahmed S/O Late Abdul Majid Ahmed
Lady Yashodabai Joshi Ladies Club, Thr. Secretary, Amravati and Another Vs Shri. Harvijay Keshavrao Kalamkhede and Another
Kirankumar S/O Babulalji Mehadia and Ors. Vs Nagpur Municipal Corporation Thr Municipal Commissioner
Ramesh Laxman Sonawane vs the State of Maharashtra