Bail application under Section 439 CrPC; after hearing counsel and reviewing investigating papers, the court was disinclined to grant bail. Counsel withdrew the application, which the court disposed of as withdrawn, directing the trial court to expedite the trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:484
(1) 32.A.ba.426.2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (BA) NO. 426 OF 2023
Sunil s/o Khemraj Bahekar
Vs.
State of Maharashtra, Through Police Station Officer, Ranapratap Nagar, District Nagpur
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Mr. J. K. Matale, Advocate for applicant.
Mrs. M. A. Barabde, APP for non-applicant/State.
CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J. DATED : 12/01/2024
(URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.)
Sarkate
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sunil s/o Khemraj Bahekar
State of Maharashtra, Through Police Station Officer, Ranapratap Nagar, District Nagpur
Urmila Joshi-Phalke
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
