Allowed

Rohan @ Jaggu Ashok Shinde v. State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC22 Oct 2024BA/4132/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The applicant sought bail under Section 439 CrPC for offences under Sections 307, 143, 147, 148, 149 r/w 34 IPC. Granting bail to co-accused on similar facts and noting the absence of an identification parade, the Court applied the principle of parity and allowed the bail application subject to conditions.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted in Crime No.497 of 2023 on furnishing P.R.Bond of Rs. 25,000 with one solvent surety.

Rohan @ Jaggu Ashok Shinde vs State of Maharashtra — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

947-BA4132-2024.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 4132 OF 2024

¶5

Rohan @ Jaggu Ashok Shinde ... Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent.

¶6

Mr Sachin H. Deokar a/w Vignesh Ashokan & Suraj Gadkari, Advocate for Applicant

¶7

Ms Veera Shinde, APP for the State.

¶8

API Raje, Pune Rural Police Station

¶9

CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR, J. DATED : OCTOBER 23, 2024.

¶10

PC:

¶11

Heard.

¶12

By this application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure the applicant is seeking bail in Crime No.497 of 2023, registered with Khed Police Station, District: Pune for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 143, 147, 148, 149 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

¶13

This Court granted bail to co-accused Dinesh Shinde, Vishal Satkar, Sameer Sawant and Jayesh Shinde. The role of the

1 of 3

RRaut

947-BA4132-2024.doc

applicant is similar to the co-accused who have been released on bail. Except the applicant all other accused are released on bail. No identification parade was conducted despite the eyewitness do not know the names of the assailants.

¶18

In the circumstances, as the principle of parity will apply in this matter, I pass the following order:

¶19

i) The Criminal Application is allowed.

¶20

ii) It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail in connection with Crime No.497 of 2023, registered with Khed Police Station, District: Pune for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 143, 147, 148, 149 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, on furnishing P.R.Bond in the sum of Rupees Twenty Five Thousand with one solvent surety in the like amount;

¶21

iii) The applicant shall attend the concerned Police Station on first day of every month between 10:00 am and 11:00 am, till conclusion of the trial, except on the date of the trial.

¶22

iv) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case, as also not tamper with the evidence;

2 of 3

RRaut

947-BA4132-2024.doc

v) Liberty is granted to the State to apply for cancellation of bail if the applicant commits similar offence or breaches any condition for grant of bail.

¶27

vi) The applicant shall attend the trial before the trial Court regularly on every date unless exemption is granted by the trial Court.

¶28

The Criminal Application is disposed of accordingly.

¶29

(ANIL S. KILOR, J)

¶30

3 of 3

¶31

RRaut

Rohan @ Jaggu Ashok Shinde v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rohan @ Jaggu Ashok Shinde v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ganesh Mahesh Jagnade vs State of Maharashtra

Ajay Sanjay Aadhav vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Sagar Anandrao Gundav vs State of Maharashtra

Sau. Latabai Sambhaji Deshmukh vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Divisional Commissioner Nagpur Divsion, Nagpur and Another

Vaibhav Ravindra Borate vs State of Maharashtra

Sudam Ramchandra Tarange vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.