Roshan Naresh @ Narendra Jadhav v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application adjourned as the learned APP sought time to intimate respondent no. 2. Matter posted for further hearing.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
942-ba-3933-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.3933 OF 2024
Roshan Naresh @ Narendra Jadhav ... Applicant V/s.
The State of Maharashtra and Anr. … Respondents
Mr. Karanshing Rajput a/w Mahaveer and Anukul Seth, for the applicant.
Mr. S.S. Ghag, APP, for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR, J.
Digitally signed by VARSHA VARSHA DEEPAK DEEPAK GAIKWAD GAIKWAD Date: 2024.10.19 12:02:56 +0530
PC:
DATE : 18TH OCTOBER, 2024.
- The learned APP seeks time to give intimation to the respondent no. 2.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Roshan Naresh @ Narendra Jadhav
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
- respondent
Respondent No. 2
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court