A bail application became moot after the amicus curiae reported that the applicant had already been acquitted by the Sessions Judge, Satara, in the underlying sessions case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
904-BA-386-2023.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.386 OF 2023
Shailendra Shashi Nayar…Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra…Respondent
Ms. Priyanka H. Chavan, Amicus Curiae, for the Applicant.
Ms. Supriya Kak, APP, for the Respondent-State.
CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 11th MARCH 2024
PC:-
1. As the Advocate-on-record was not appearing in the matter,
Ms. Priyanka Chavan, learned Advocate has been appointed on
earlier date as Amicus Curiae to assist the Court.
2.Ms. Chavan, learned Counsel states that she has conducted a
search on the website of the District Court and according to the
same, the Applicant has been acquitted by Judgment and Order
dated 28th July 2023 passed in Sessions Case No.152 of 2022 by a
learned Sessions Judge, Satara. Ms. Chavan, learned Counsel
tenders copy of the said Judgment.
Page 1 of 2
Sonali
904-BA-386-2023.DOC
3. Accordingly, nothing survives in the Bail Application and the same is disposed of as such.
4.This Court places on record its appreciation for the
assistance rendered by Ms. Chavan, learned Amicus Curiae
appointed to represent the Applicant. Her professional charges be
paid as per the rules.
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
Signed by: Sonali Patil Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 11/03/2024 18:24:30 Sonali
Page 2 of 2
Shailendra Shashi Nayar
The State of Maharashtra
Madhav J. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court