Kailas Manohar Ainkar v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application adjourned due to paucity of time, with any interim order to continue until the next date.
What did the court decide?
Interim order, if any, continued till 24/10/2024.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-0
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 3824 OF 2024
Kailas Manohar Ainkar ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR J
DATE : 10th October, 2024
P.C. :
Due to paucity of time, stand over to 24/10/2024. Interim order, if any, to continue till then.
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Page 1/1
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Kailas Manohar Ainkar
- respondent
State Of Maharashtra
Coram
Anil S. Kilor
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Shri Shaikshanik and Samajik Bahuddeshiya Sanstha, Thr. Secretary, Amit S/O Narayan Bhongade Vs Durgaprasad S/O Babulal Shakya
Sakharam Narayan Pawane Vs the Divisional Commissioner, Amravati and Others
Shankar Bhaduji Nimsatkar Vs Harish Keshav Bamniya and Others
Executive Engineer, L.P. Yojna, Washim Vs Vikram Tukaram Walkje (Dead) through L.Rs and Another