Naushad Ahmed Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Clubbed bail applications by two applicants seeking adjournment; the court deferred consideration for want of time to the next day and directed interim orders to continue.
What did the court decide?
Matter stood over to 05/12/2024; existing interim orders to continue till then.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-6
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 3429 OF 2024
Raghini Suresh Patil ....APPLICANT V/S
State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ....RESPONDENT
WITH
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 3498 OF 2024
Raghini Suresh Patil ....APPLICANT V/S
State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ....RESPONDENT
WITH
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 3586 OF 2024
Naushad Ahmed Shaikh ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT
WITH
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Raghini Suresh Patil
- respondent
State of Maharashtra
- applicant
Naushad Ahmed Shaikh
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
20 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court