The applicant sought withdrawal of a bail application. Leave was granted to withdraw. The application was dismissed as withdrawn, with a direction for expeditious trial.
Leave granted to withdraw the application; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
5-BA358-2024.DOC
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 358 OF 2024
SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI
Digitally signed by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2024.04.19 11:18:40 +0530
Aishwarya Sarjuprasad Mishra ...Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra …Respondent
Mr. Priyanshu Mishra, for the Applicant. Ms. Supriya Kak, APP for the State/Respondent No.1. Mr. Sukrut Mhatre, i/b Dinesh Nishad, for the first
informant – respondent No.2.
CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED: 17th APRIL, 2024
PC:-
seeks leave to withdraw the application.
3. Application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
relationship between the parties, it may be expedient that the trial court makes an endeavour to commence and conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible.
[N. J. JAMADAR, J.]
1/1
Santosh Subhash Kulkarni
State of Maharashtra
N. J. JAMADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
