Bail application withdrawn by the applicant's counsel after the Court expressed disinclination to entertain it; application dismissed as withdrawn, with a request that the trial be expedited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
12-BA-3193-22.DOC
Sayali Upasani
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.- 3193 OF 2022
Shashi @ Sashi Chiknu Jurmani … Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
SAYALI DEEPAK UPASANI
Mr. Vinod Kashid i/b Mr. Sumit Bhoite, Abdul Shaikh, for Applicant.
Ms. Ranjana D. Humane, APP for State/Respondent.
Digitally signed by SAYALI DEEPAK UPASANI Date: 2024.04.20 13:32:56 +0530
CORAM:- N. J. JAMADAR, J.
DATED:- 17th APRIL, 2024.
PC:-
disinclination to entertain the application, the learned Counsel for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw the application.
Leave granted.
1/2
12-BA-3193-22.DOC
No. 78 of 2022 is requested to make an endevour to commence and conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible.
[N. J. JAMADAR, J.]
2/2
Shashi @ Sashi Chiknu Jurmani
The State of Maharashtra
N. J. Jamadar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
