Sanjay Kalpanath Pandey v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application under MCOCA; State granted four weeks to file reply, matter listed for further consideration. No substantive decision rendered.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
52_BA_3380_24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3380 OF 2024
Sanjay Kalpanath Pandey … Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Dr. Samarth Shrikant Karmarkar a/w. Ms. Supriya Arun Pandey, i/b. Karmarkar and Associates for applicant.
Mr. Kiran C. Shinde, APP for respondent-State.
CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J. DATE : 07th OCTOBER, 2024
P.C. :
- . Since offences under the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 are also registered in the present case, the respondent-State is granted time of four weeks to file its reply. An advance copy be served on the learned counsel appearing for the applicant.
- List for further consideration on 13.11.2024, High on Board.
(MANISH PITALE, J)
Priya Kambli
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sanjay Kalpanath Pandey
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
Manish Pitale
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
13 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court