Roshan Ramchandra Saroj v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application adjourned due to paucity of time; interim orders, if any, to continue until the next date.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-0
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 3237 OF 2024
Roshan Ramchandra Saroj ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR J DATE : 19th December, 2024
P.C. :
Due to paucity of time, stand over to 13/01/2025. Interim order, if any, to continue till then.
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Page 1/1
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Roshan Ramchandra Saroj
- respondent
State of Maharashtra
Coram
Anil S. Kilor
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
22 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Deshbhakta Ratnappanna Kumbhar through Its Chairman vs State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary
Beena Raju Sharma and Anr. vs Parvesh Chandrabal Mehta and Anr.
Cholamandalam M.S. General Insurance Co.Ltd., Mumbai vs Aparna Haribhau Divekar and Ors.
Icici Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Smt. Prerana Jayaram Ambekar and Anr.