Akshaya Dattatraya Veikhande v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail applications adjourned due to paucity of time; interim orders, if any, to continue until the next hearing date.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-29
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 3180 OF 2024
Akshaya Dattatraya Veikhande ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT
WITH
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 4048 OF 2024
Bashir Ibrahim Shaikh ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE J DATE : 27th November, 2024
P.C. :
Due to paucity of time, stand over to 06/01/2025. Interim order, if any, to continue till then.
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Page 1/1
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Akshaya Dattatraya Veikhande
- respondent
State Of Maharashtra
- applicant
Bashir Ibrahim Shaikh
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court