Vrushab Ramdas Shewale v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application stood over to the next day due to paucity of time; interim orders, if any, were directed to continue till then.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-0
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 3119 OF 2024
Vrushab Ramdas Shewale ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR J DATE : 8th October, 2024
P.C. :
Due to paucity of time, stand over to 09/10/2024. Interim order, if any, to continue till then.
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Page 1/1
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Vrushab Ramdas Shewale
- respondent
State Of Maharashtra
Coram
Anil S. Kilor
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
16 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court